NU students in subpoena battle get backing


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ chicagomedia.org :: Chicago Radio, TV, All Media Discussion Forum ]

Posted by chicagomedia.org on January 11, 2010 at 15:53:10:

News organizations back NU students in subpoena battle
January 11, 2010 12:51 PM


Journalistic heavy hitters lent support today to an effort to toss out a prosecutors' subpoena for notes, grades and other materials from Northwestern University journalism students, an investigator and their professor in connection with the case of a man the students argue was wrongfully convicted.

The Cook County state's attorney's office also subpoenaed videos, grading criteria and more from a Medill Innocence Project investigation into the case of Anthony McKinney, convicted of the 1978 shotgun murder of a Harvey security guard.

Attorneys for the school have fought the subpoena, saying the students, professor David Protess and private investigator Sergio Serritella were all working as journalists when they gathered affidavits, documents and videotaped interviews.

Today, an attorney representing the Chicago Tribune, the New York Times, the Chicago Sun-Times, CBS News, the Washington Post and the Hearst Corp. -- in addition to a dozen more newsgathering organizations -- filed a brief in Cook County Circuit Court opposing the the forced surrender of the material.

"I think the point of the (filing) is to explain to the court the importance that a large number of journalism organizations give to the position that Northwestern and Mr. Protess are taking here," said the media group's attorney, David Sanders of the Chicago-based firm of Jenner and Block. "These are important issues."

In November, the state's attorney's office filed documents in the case laying out allegations by various witnesses of bribery and improper influence exerted on the part of the Medill Innocence Project. The students, Protess and Serritella all deny the accusations.

In response to that November filing, attorneys for Northwestern University filed today yet another brief in support of the judge throwing out the subpoena.

In that brief, attorneys did not respond to each of the accusations in the state's attorney filing, instead dealing with various legal issues. But the Northwestern filing did reiterate the defendants' previous assertions that a questioned travel payment for a witness was not a bribe, as suggested in the prosecutors' last filing.

It also further argued that students were not predisposed to uncover evidence of McKinney's innocence in their investigation.

Protess, the Northwestern professor who created the Medill Innocence Project, said he was pleased to have backing for his argument that reporter shield laws protect his students.

"We received support from the national media as well as our friends in the local media for the positions we've taken all along," Protess said after Judge Diane Gordon Cannon ruled that she would accept the amicus, or, friend of the court, briefs.

Also filed today was a support brief by organizations including the Student Press Law Center and the Society of Professional Journalists. Erin Bolan Hines, of the Chicago-based firm of Baker and Hostetler, represented student groups who also oppose the release of the Medill Innocence Project information.

For more on the legal battle between the two parties, here's an article from the February 2010 issue of Chicago Magazine.

-- Georgia Garvey



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:



Enter verification code:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ chicagomedia.org :: Chicago Radio, TV, All Media Discussion Forum ]


postings are the opinions of their respective posters and site ownership disclaims any responsibility for the content contained.
(register a domain name, host your web site, accept credit cards, get a unix shell account)